Compare 21 NSFW AI generators: policies, uploads and prices

How to read the matrix

✓ means yes, or that the statement exists on a page we read; ✗ means no, not offered, or not stated; ? means we could not settle it on our date, usually because the vendor's own pages contradict each other.

Four columns — reference-photo upload, face-swap, undress and real-person likeness program — turn amber on a ✓ instead of green, because those are the answers that widen what a product can be pointed at.

The video column carries the maximum clip length where the vendor prints one, from 10 seconds to 60; styles are the categories the vendor advertises. Paid from is the first row of its price table, copied as printed, so cells are not directly comparable: Kupid AI prices by the week, PixAI prints an annual charge, and Promptchan AI, Secrets AI and Swipey AI read $0 because a free plan heads their table. We neither convert nor annualize; three rows show a dash because no public page printed a price.

Eight names link to the vendor instead of a review, marked facts verified · no full review: Yume AI, EroPlay, DreamGF, Fantasy.ai, PornPen, Infatuated, Unstability.ai and HeraHaven. Their columns come from the same sources, read on the same dates; what is missing is the long-form page, not the verification.

What “ban stated” means — and what it does not

A ✓ under real-person ban stated or minors ban stated means one thing: a sentence to that effect exists on a page we read, quoted in full on that tool's review where we have published one. A ✗ means we found no such sentence — not that the tool permits it, but that the rule is not written where a user can find it. Four rows carry that gap on real people: HeraHaven, Kupid AI, NovelAI and PixAI; three of them state nothing about minors either.

A ✓ is no guarantee. Fourteen of the seventeen stated real-person rules carry a caveat in our record, usually a condition that narrows it: impersonation forbidden only when deceptive or harmful, or a real person not depicted without consent. Occasionally it runs the other way: Lovescape's binding terms forbid companions closely resembling real public figures outright, while softer consent-worded copy sits elsewhere on its domain.

Enforcement is what no table can show, and the age gate proves little either: sixteen sites showed a click-through notice, a button rather than a check; five are recorded as none seen on the pages we read; none asked for identity verification.

Why uploads and likeness programs get their own columns

A text-only generator can only invent a face; one that accepts a photograph has an input path governed by the real-person policy two columns over. Six ranked tools accept a reference photo: GirlfriendGPT, Lovescape, NovelAI, OurDream, PixAI and Unstability.ai. The pair to look at is NovelAI and PixAI: uploads accepted, no real-person rule stated.

Contradictions are printed, not resolved. OurDream's marketing page advertises reference upload and face swap while its help center says reference photos may not be uploaded; both are quoted on its review, and it holds the only ✓ in the face-swap column. Lovescape's ✓ rests on marketing copy — a home-page remix that transforms an uploaded photo, and a video generator that invites an uploaded image or video as a base — against terms that permit an avatar only. The two question marks are Infatuated, whose content policy forbids user uploads while another of its pages describes an input image, and Sexy AI, whose public pages show only image-to-video from your own library while its beta app keeps upload machinery behind a login.

The undress column reads ✗ for all 21 — a rule, not a coincidence: a product built to strip a supplied photo is not ranked here at all. Twenty-two such products — undress apps, face-swap tools for real people's photos, and generators whose own terms forbid adult output — are named on the not-listed page, each with the sentence from its own site that put it there.

The last amber column is the vendor's own likeness business. Four run one: Candy AI's Candy Creators sells digital twins of named content creators, each made in partnership with the creator; Fantasy.ai's Verified profiles are described as AI versions of real models and OnlyFans creators; Swipey AI's Verified Creator Models are AI Twins built with the creator's own participation and ID verification; Infatuated offers adult creators an AI twin of themselves. These are consented, licensed programs; the flag is not an allegation but a marker of the one place where a vendor's own product is the exception to its own real-person rule. If that does not change your decision, ignore the column — which is the point of separate columns instead of one score.